The 11th Hour: Only Governments Can Make the Big Changes Affecting the Environment, But There Are Still Lots of Real-World Solutions for the Average Joe!
by Jessica Mosby
USA
In an admirable effort to contribute to the dialogue on what to do to save the planet, Leonardo DiCaprio has recently released a documentary film, The 11th Hour, which he produced and narrates. However, if you are already feeling overwhelmed by the world’s problems and suffering, you probably shouldn’t see it. It might push you over the proverbial edge as surely as if you were a polar bear slipping unexpectedly off a melting glacier!
One problem is The 11th Hour’s narrative structure, or lack thereof: it is painfully short on the pizzazz needed to take environmentalism from the grassroots of individual action to an international movement. Instead, one expert pops up briefly on the screen (name, title, and credentials are dutifully noted) to lecture for a few minutes while seated in front of a black wall, then the film cuts to the next expert, and then the next. Occasionally the monotony of “expert” footage is broken up by cutting to montages of very basic news reels set to a musical score; at other times, digitally drawn diagrams appear, imposed next to an expert’s head to illustrate their points.
Maybe Al Gore’s influence has made PowerPoint a cinematic technique?
The basic premise of The 11th Hour could not be more valid: the world has lost balance in its relationship to natural resources. These resources will not grow, even though our population and spending ability does. We must change, or the consequences will be dire. A million experts can talk for hours on end, but unless the world internalizes this and changes accordingly, the future is bleak.
Everything the film asserts is true: ready or not, our generation must reverse the effects of pollution, deforestation, population explosions, soil degradation, and the ruthless exploitation of natural resources – environmentally devastating patterns that date back to the Industrial Revolution.
In other words, yes, the world needs to return to using renewable energy (namely the sun) and move away from its dependence on non-renewable fossil fuels. One of the tensions in The 11th Hour is how to effect real change. What the environmental movement really needs are viable alternatives to change the destructive course the world is on.
The film spends a lot of time blaming governments. It makes clear that our problems are so overwhelming and so systemic that only when governments and corporations make drastic alterations in policy is there any real hope that that the earth's rapid decline will be stopped and hopefully reversed for future generations.
The 11th Hour underscores that there has been total failure at that level and is especially hard on the U.S. government for being unconscionably susceptible to lobbying and corporate greed at the expense of infrastructure development. From the film, one can only conclude that the Bush administration has been a colossal disaster for the environment, and that oil companies like Exxon Mobil have worked assiduously to distort the public debate on climate change. Undeniably, a modernized infrastructure would go a long way toward allowing people to use fewer resources on a massive scale.
What bothered me was that The 11th Hour only devotes one-third of its viewing time (yes, I timed it) to “real world” alternatives, and those alternatives are discussed only in the last 30 minutes. Moreover, most of the suggestions about how individuals might change the environment by changing the way they live doesn’t apply to young people like me, or for that matter, to those who are in the lower half of the economic spectrum. It does offer a few average-Joe type solutions like buying low-energy efficient light bulbs and appliances. But the real thrust of the film is that governments must change the infrastructure. Although the ideas discussed are very America-centric, the redesign of U.S. government buildings built in the last 50 years to utilize current conservation technology is an inventive idea; it would create construction jobs and it would have lasting environmental benefits.
A Toyota Prius Hybrid does get 46 miles per gallon and costs $30,000 less than the gas-guzzling Hummer that only gets a paltry 15 miles to the gallon. Yet there are people who still choose to drive Hummers; however these people probably do not recycle and will never see The 11th Hour.
The film proposes an economic policy that would decrease income taxes and increase gas taxes; this idea assumes that there is an alternative to driving. I live in California; I know from daily experience that unfortunately fast reliable public transportation is still either insufficient or altogether absent in far too many cities and towns.
• This "green" home was featured in Wired Magazine for its innovative insulation and design. Photograph by Jon Rawlinson. •
I have my own suggestions for individuals to make positive changes: if powering your home via solar power is not an option for you, then small and relatively inexpensive universal chargers, such as the Solio Sport Hybrid 1000 Solar Charger, use solar power to charge your cell phones and MP3 players. To fight deforestation, you can buy used pieces of furniture or wood products made from sustainable alternatives such bamboo or cork.
Buying organic food seems like an obvious choice for any environmentalist, but we must remember that by buying organic meat from Australia, any environmental benefit gained by the farmer’s not having used pesticides or hormones is lost by transporting the meat from “Down Under” to your local grocery store. So instead, buy locally grown organic food, especially at Farmers Markets; it will save valuable resources in the transportation of goods and it supports your local economy.
The American economy is fueled by our insatiable need for goods; changing the very nature of our society seems unlikely. But the American desire for profitability can be channeled into businesses that promote sustainability and which also have mass appeal. Recycling should transcend plastics and include everything in one’s home. Imagine the impact it would have if even fifty percent of everyone’s recent purchases were used instead of new?
• This "earthship" in New Mexico is made from materials indigenous to the planet. It provides it's own heat, cooling, water, electricity and sewage treatment. Photograph by Lori Greig. •
A common retort amongst many of my “me-first” friends is, “I could go buy it new at the store, or I could look on Craigslist.” For those not familiar with the international phenomenon started by Craig Newmark in 1995, the for-profit website is an online mecca for people looking for jobs, homes, dates, and used goods for sale or free, organized to serve specific geographical areas.
My favorite part of the site to troll is the section where people post the location of goods they left on the street for free. Yes, for free! If you look long enough, you can find anything on Craigslist! The site, which operates out of a modest home in San Francisco’s Sunset District, only charges for posting job ads, so for most of the people viewing the site (which receives over five billion hits a month), the service is free. The company is not publicly held, but profits are estimated at $125 million in 2007.
The 11th Hour is accurate in its description of the American work life balance: you work more so you can spend more. Environmentalism is about more than saving the environment, it’s about saving humans by saving the environment. But is the answer really to slow down and consume less, or can we channel our fervor to creating a sustainable way to live? In the film, sustainable design experts William McDonough and Bruce Mau posit that “Today design asks, ‘What if we could do anything? What if the questions surrounding design turned out to be the big questions? What if life itself became a design project?’ ”
Right. I am working on designing my own life to benefit both myself and the planet. There are everyday things that everyone can do to conserve resources. It may seem a cliché to bring your own bags to the store, recycle, buy used clothing and furniture, grocery shop at your local farmers market, and ride public transportation instead of driving, but until the entire world is on board, these accessible solutions should at least be considered.
Then there is the water we drink. Slashing the consumption of water bottles is a good place to start: 25 million water bottles are tossed away each day. According to the Earth Policy Institute, and as the "Think Outside the Bottle" campaign of Corporate Accountability International points out:
"American demand for bottled water consumes more than 1.5 million barrels of oil annually just to make the bottles, enough to fuel some 100,000 U.S. cars for a year.Add to this the green house gases emissions from the long-distance transportation of bottled water and you have a clear illustration of what rather simple behavior changes on our part can do to reduce unnecessary waste."
This is a change that is easy to make!
• Leonardo DiCaprio filming The 11th Hour. Photograph by Chuck Castleberry © 2007 Eleventeen Productions, LLC - courtesy of Warner Independent Pictures. •
I would have found it more convincing if Leo had spoken candidly on an issue he has to know up close: how decadent celebrity culture can be. So often celebrities publicly promote their environmental causes, yet conspicuously consume more resources than the average person. I know Leo himself now drives a Prius; I am told he lives in a solar-powered house. But I would rather he had discussed the process he went through in coming to those decisions. Personally, I would have found a thoughtful discussion contrasting his present lifestyle with how he lived before he became aware of the planet’s crisis much more credible. I would rather he had declared outright that he actively rejects large houses, private jets, and gas guzzling vehicles in favor of a simpler life which conserves resources.
A piece of news not part of The 11th Hour, but one whose matter-of-fact, let’s-take-action tone was in marked contrast to this film’s deadly seriousness was learning that The Live Earth concerts converted at least one celebrity: Apparently, after Fergie of the Black Eyed Peas performed at the environmental benefit show, she then decided to sell her Hummer and donate the money to Global Green USA, a group founded Mikhail Gorbachev.
Now that is a testimony I find convincing!
About the Author
Jessica Mosby is a writer and critic living in Berkeley, California. In the rare moments when she's not traveling across the United States for work, Jessica enjoys listening to public radio, buying organic food at local farmers markets, trolling junk stores, and collecting owl-themed tchotchke.

Comments (4)
Great piece - especially your thoughts on how it would help to hear how well known people "changed their lifestyle".
Posted by Louise | September 29, 2007 7:24 AM
Really well-written review! I, too, feel overwhelmed by the amount of information about the problem, and am ready to move on to simple ideas for the solution. I still hold hope for humanity that we can turn this around and make our loves work with sustainable resources, and raise the standard of living for everyone. Thanks for your thoughts.
Posted by Peggy Bocox | September 30, 2007 10:49 AM
This is the smartest and most entertaining review I've read in a long time. Thanks for saving me the time and money on the film. Yes, I agree with the premise, ditto on the dilemma of living in LA. The contents of my house are COMPLETELY made up of older, preused, gifted, hand-me-downs yet it is so warm and inviting; everybody that comes over wants to live here. etc. etc.
But, Hey when is somebody going to bring up the well documented fact that eating meat is the MOST environmentally disastrous practice of all. Forget about the long distance shipping, what about the enormous methane gas by-product which outstrips car emissions accross the globe by far? What about the horrific waste water runoff problem? What about all the food that is fed to these animals taking away what could be used by starving humans. These lands are also being overused and will stop producing one day as much of the land already has from California to Kansas.
But forget about the US lands, what about the Rainforest whose newly burnt down and cleared lands have been supplying everybody with fast food burgers for YEARS. Don't pretend you didn't know. And there is so much more to this problem. In addition, the overfishing of the ocean for all the sushi places and fabulous restaurants across the globe is stripping the oceans bare. Don't believe it? A little basic checking will set you straight. Or wait, is this information just too much. It's really the biggest taboo of all. But we must wake up and get real about this issue. Vegetarianism is the only way out.
Posted by Nina | October 18, 2007 10:34 PM
I think Nina raises a really good and important point. Worldwide vegetarianism in today's day and age could rapidly put a stop to further environmental degradation. I live with a vegetarian and though I love a perfectly broiled petit filet mignon just like the next girl, I save it for really special occasions. 99% of what we make and cook at home is vegetable based and I eat really, really well (for those of you skeptics who think you'd be "missing out" if you abandoned regular meat eating). I maybe eat meat (chicken, fish, steak and occasionally pork) 4 times a month.
There was a time, as described to me by my grandfather, when families had to wait for special occasions to enjoy a nice pot roast - a time when it was too expensive to put meat on the table every night of the week. In the decades since, it's the prevailing out-of-control consumer mentality that put a higher premium on mass quantities of everything, at a low-low price, that has thrown things out of balance. Our need to even have fast food restaurants in the US as meal options are testaments to the gastronic lows that we're willing to suffer for a meal under $2.
I wish we could return to an age of moderation, where deferred gratification meant that people actually appreciated the little things and where the need to consume was carefully balanced with "need" instead of "greed".
Posted by Sarah McGowan, Content/Photo Editor | October 19, 2007 3:18 PM