Germany’s Political Debate on the Role of the Family
by Vera von Kreutzbruck
Germany
The Nazis offered incentives to German women to procreate and introduced the “Lebensborn” program (fount of life in German) to create a master race of blond, blue-eyed children. Mothers with three or more children under 10 years old received “honorary cards” allowing them to jump shopping queues and get discounts on their rent. Cheap state loans were offered for parents, and there was the “Mother’s Cross” medal: bronze for four children, silver for six and gold for eight.
Eva Herman’s comments provoked outrage in Germany. Soon after this incident, she was fired by the public broadcaster (ARD) that had employed her for 19 years as a newscaster for the most popular news program in the country. Her only support came from the far-right National Democratic Party (NPD), which went so far as to invite her to advise them on family policy.
• "Raven Mothers" are criticized for leaving their children to return to work. Photograph by Madeleine Castillon. •
Even the publisher of her bestselling books has distanced himself from Herman declaring recently to a newspaper that her latest behavior on TV is the “biggest disaster” he has experienced in his 40 years as a publisher.
In fact, the whole controversy dates back to last year, when the 48-year-old journalist published her first anti-feminist pamphlet, The Eve Principle, which skyrocketed to the bestseller list in Germany soon after its release. The book promotes a return to pre-feminism ideals by declaring that women should stay at home and bear children since, Herman argues, if they don’t change their behavior, the country will die out.
Soon afterwards the former anchorwoman became the target of scorn from all sides of the political spectrum. Accused of sending women back to the 1950s, her critics said that she, as someone who successfully combines her career with childrearing, was guilty of hypocrisy.
Parent Money
• Ursula von der Leyen advocates for mothers to return to the work force as soon as possible. Photograph courtesy of the German Family Ministry. •
Von der Leyen, mother of seven children, is a member of the center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU), which rules in conjunction with the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD); the conservative CDU is not exactly famous for its liberal policies towards women.
Flying in the face of opposition from within her own ranks, the Family Minister launched a series of radical measures to encourage reluctant German couples to breed. The measures - a combined version of the flexible child care of France with the financial incentives of Sweden - include tax breaks for working couples, more public daycare centers for kids under three and a state-funded welfare scheme.
Under the plan, which came into effect on January 1, the federal government pays mothers or fathers two-thirds of their last net paycheck - up to $2,500 (€1,800) - for up to 12 months so long as they stay at home to take care of their baby. And if the other parent takes an additional two months off to care for the child, the government gives the couple two extra months of pay.
The major disadvantage of this new program, known as “Elterngeld,” or Parent Money in English, is that it primarily benefits financially well off families since the financial support is tied to income. The unemployed and low earners actually did better under the old system, which paid up to $425 (€300) a month for two years.
Raven Mothers
Nonetheless, what originally seemed like a simple idea is, in fact, a controversial program in a country where preschoolers tend to stay at home, and mothers who send their kids out into the world too soon are labeled “raven mothers”. (The raven, a common bird, is known to push its young out of the nest at a very early age. Germans use this phrase as a synonym for bad parent.)
Elsewhere in Europe or in the USA, both women and men are used to leaving their young children in daycare so that the mothers can return to the labor market. In contrast, working women in Germany have a particularly hard time getting back to work once they have a child, due to the country’s lack of full-day schools, kindergartens and public daycare centers.Indeed, the German government has been slow to adapt its family policies to the exigencies of the typical modern family. However, most Germans remain unconvinced that the new payment system will change anything. Barely a fifth of the population believe that the new law will lead to more births, according to a survey published at the beginning of the year.
However, what’s interesting is that the debate reflects a departure from the tradition of preschoolers’ staying at home, which was previously the family-care policy of the two main parties, the Social Democrats and the Christian Social Union. The emergence of the “Elterngeld,” or Parent Money program and the debate on what is ideal family care is in and of itself a victory. It still remains to be seen which model will best fit the changing German society.
About the Author
Vera von Kreutzbruck was born in Argentina. She started her career in journalism at the English language newspaper, Buenos Aires Herald. After a fellowship in Germany three years ago, she decided to settle in Berlin. She currently works as a freelance journalist contributing to media in Europe and Latin America. Her articles focus on international news and culture in Germany and the European Union.

Comments (2)
Interesting debate. Do they only offer this money for mothers who are blonde?
Over population is one of the biggest problems we have so paying women for children sees a little strange to me. But on the other hand, paying women who do have children to give them the best care possible may be a good idea.
Posted by Arlyn Serber | October 21, 2007 8:58 PM
In Sweden many fathers have stayed home with their newborns thanks to the "parent-money" that the Swedish system offers. It is not uncomplicated but it is giving families new opportunties to organize their lifes. Still, one can question whether ALL families should receive this benefit - even those with high income.
Posted by Louise Belfrage | October 22, 2007 8:30 AM