From the WIP

« She Is the Matador: Blood Sport, Sexism, and Steadfast Ambition | Main | Transsexuals in the Middle East Await the Wave of Change »

August 31, 2009

Weighing the Risks and Benefits of Hormone Replacement Therapy

Chelsea Mooser

by Dr. Chelsea Mooser
- USA -


As a breast cancer researcher, I tend to be the go-to gal on all topics science. A few weeks ago a woman asked me if, considering the risks and the benefits, I would go on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) during menopause. I hadn’t given the topic much thought. I knew from conversations with women who had gone through menopause that estrogen was remarkable in relieving the hot flashes, cognitive impairment, sagging skin, and mood swings associated with “The Change.” On the other hand, as a breast cancer researcher, I also knew about the health risks. But like any typical pre-menopausal woman I hadn’t really thought about it that much.

mooser_hrt.jpg
For women experiencing the symptoms of menopause, HRT can greatly improve quality of life but can also increase the risk of developing breast cancer. Photograph by Dr. Chelsea Mooser.
However upon recent examination of several new gray hairs I realized that I, too, would eventually have to make this decision, and I had no idea what I’d do. To try to understand the risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy, I did what any good scientist would: I researched.

According to French physicians in the 1800s, menopause is l'age de retour, a time when women can return to the bliss of their pre-fertile youth. Or according to a bumper sticker I saw the other day, menopause “sucks.” Regardless of one’s perception of menopause, one thing is certain – at around age 50 most women’s ovaries stop pumping out estrogen. Dr. Janet Pregler, director of the UCLA Iris Cantor Women’s Health Center explains, “women who take hormone replacement therapy generally take two hormones: estrogen which is used to treat the menopause symptoms and then progesterone which is used to prevent uterine cancer which will occur if you take estrogen by itself. These are the two hormones that are produced by the ovaries when you go through menstrual cycles, which are much decreased when you go through menopause.”

Although it’s not clear exactly why decreases in these hormones cause the symptoms of menopause, it is clear that supplementing women with estrogen alleviates them. But ever since the inception of HRT in 1942 there were reports on its connection to breast cancer. Although there have been some conflicting studies, “there is really no question now by pretty much anyone who has looked at the data that estrogen plus progesterone promotes breast cancer,” says Dr. Pregler. Her assertion is most strongly supported by two landmark studies.

In the 1990s the National Institutes of Health set up the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) to study the risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy. According to a 2002 press release from the NIH, the trial was halted after researchers found an “increased risk of invasive breast cancer” and “increases in coronary heart disease, stroke, and pulmonary embolism in study participants on estrogen plus progestin compared to women taking placebo pills.” A few years later researchers with the UK-based Million Women Study asked over a million women during mammogram appointments to tell them what kind of hormones they were taking. They then followed these women to find out if they got breast cancer or not. “The study confirmed what we saw in the WHI, which is an increased risk for breast cancer,” says Dr. Pregler.

Although the clinical trials are convincing, as a scientist I am always a bit skeptical of their results. In a clinical trial it is often difficult to control for all the variables that can contribute to a disease like breast cancer. I wanted to understand if, on a biological level, estrogen could promote breast cancer.

From my own work I know that cancer arises from a single cell that has undergone a series of genetic mutations that allow it to mutate into a tumor. When a cell divides – or proliferates – it has the potential to pick up these genetic mutations. Therefore, proliferation can lead to mutations, which can lead to cancer.

To understand how estrogen affects cells in the mammary gland, I spoke with Dr. Tim Lane, a senior breast cancer researcher at UCLA. “All throughout life estrogen drives proliferation of cells in the mammary gland,” he explains. This proliferation in the mammary gland is important during development and pregnancy, but proliferation also opens the door for genetic mutations. “Any cell that is being asked to proliferate is at the highest risk of becoming cancerous. The more times proliferation happens during a life, the more times you might get a mutant cell.”

By taking estrogen women essentially cause continued proliferation of cells that normally wouldn’t proliferate after menopause. Although a few extra years of proliferation spurred by HRT won’t guarantee that the cells will get mutated, it does increase the opportunity for mutations.

Of course hormone replacement therapy does have significant benefits. As Dr. Lane confirms, when it comes to treating menopausal symptoms and protecting bones from osteoporosis, “HRT is the only game in town.” So how significant is the breast cancer risk associated with HRT?

According to Dr. Pregler, “hormones probably do have some increased risk but the overall increased risk is small and consistent with other lifestyle choices we make.” She put this risk into perspective with a story from her own life. “I didn’t have my first child until I was 32, that increased my lifetime risk of breast cancer by about one percent, which is well within the realm of taking hormones for a few years.” When her patients ask her about the risks of HRT, Dr. Pregler considers the particular situation of each woman. “Is the risk zero? No. Would I recommend it to a breast cancer survivor or a woman who is high risk? No. On the other hand, a woman who is at normal risk who is having bad symptoms? I think it is certainly a reasonable choice to make.”

And what will I tell someone the next time I am asked about hormone replacement therapy? I will explain that HRT is just one of many factors that causes a small but significant increase in breast cancer risk. For me, since I’ve made other dicey lifestyle choices – still no kids at 32, a smoker when I was young and reckless – it’s not an added risk I want to take.

When I asked my aunt – who has experienced both menopause and breast cancer, which one was worse – she says she’d take a hot flash over chemo any day of the week.



About the Author
Dr. Chelsea Mooser, Ph.D. is scientist and a writer living in Los Angeles. She received her doctorate from the department of Biological Chemistry at UCLA in 2009 for her work on breast cancer. Prior to coming to Los Angeles she was a research assistant studying genetics at the Jackson Laboratory in Maine.

Before becoming a research scientist, Chelsea received her BA from College of the Atlantic in Bar Harbor, Maine and spent a year working with AIDS orphans in Zimbabwe. She hopes to continue to bring science to non-scientists through teaching, writing and building science programs in developing countries. She fills her spare time with flea markets, brunches with friends and traveling.

Comments (5)

Chelsea, what a fascinating yet age-old debate about prescription drugs. Like with HRT, most drugs have their fair share of side effects. Who decides what's safe? Or safe enough, really.

I appreciate your attention to this issue. Your writing made it easy to understand the science for all of us "non-scientists," as you say. Thank you!

It is interesting to read this article in the context of women's liberation. Should we be liberated from old age and all of its unpleasantness- or are we opening ourselves to dangerous diseases such as breast cancer as we try to fight off sagging skin and hot flashes?

It seems there is no easy answer to this debate. It is much easier to side with the anti-hormone replacement therapy crowd right now because I am under thirty and not experiencing any of menopause's devastating side effects. Thank you for your article, which explains so clearly the pros and cons of both sides along with a female perspective.

I am sixty-three and thus grew up in the "wonder drug" age. Children of my generation were shot full of antibiotics with every severe head cold and women between my mother's age and mine were automatically given hormone replacement therapy. I remember as I grew up hearing them talk about it; many had been assured it would help them for the rest of their lives. Even women less than ten years older than I have told me that hormone therapy would keep one young and pretty.

Somehow, I doubted it and am glad things were changing for people my age, many of whom do not take hormone replacement therapy.

Margaret Mead spoke of "post menopausal zest." Having had a very early menopause, I have already lived nearly as much of my life after menopause as before it. I plan to dance till I am at least a hundred, so most of my life is going to have been post menopausal.

There really is a lot of very good life after menopause. I for one would not want to jeopardize a minute of it with even low risks that I know about.

Thank you to Dr. Mooser and the editors of the WIP for this discussion of a topic that concerns so many of us women and the men who love us.

Dr. Mooser, you inaccurately summarized the WHI breast cancer results. For the E-alone group, the risk of breast cancer was actually REDUCED, 28/10,000 for E group, 34/10,000 for placebo group. For the E+P group, the risk of breast cancer was increased. One could conclude the the progestin used in the study, Provera (medroxyprogesterone acetate) was the culprit.

I think it's important to not use the terms "estrogen" and "progestin" but use the actual chemical names. You know that the conjugated equine estrogens are not chemically identical to estradiol, and that MPA or any of the other synthetic progestins are not identical to progesterone. So if you're going to quote studies about ill effects of HRT, make sure you are honest in reporting that the studies used non-bioidentical hormones. One can conclude pretty much nothing about bioidentical hormones from these studies.

And one more thing ... part of being well is feeling good and enjoying life. After fewer than 3 weeks of hot flashes and other miserable symptoms, I gave estradiol a try and I'm LOVING it. Within 2 days I had complete relief not only from the physical symptoms but the mental ones as well, most notably a depression that I had slid into very gradually and didn't even notice until estradiol picked me back up again. I'm getting more exercise, sleeping better, eating better, and have a renewed interest in activities that had ceased to excite me.

You cannot provide the best advice if the only things you are considering is breast cancer, which even for the WHI E+P group were still relatively rare (304/10,000, only 3%, compared to placebo's 228/10,000). Also, what about the benefits of HRT, significant reduced risk of bone fractures and reduced risk of diabetes?

Not to sound too insulting, but I advise women to do their own research, make a plan, and then find a doctor willing to follow that plan. After visiting 2 doctors, one who wanted me to take birth control pills and the other who wanted me to eat more soy, dress lightly (in 10 degree Chicago weather?), and take black cohosh, I found a progressive doctor who is totally on board with bioidenticals. I was already using progesterone and she prescribed estradiol gel. I feel better now at 49 than I did at 40.

Thank you everyone for your insightful comments! I’m glad my article was able to generate some thoughts and discussion. I would like to respond directly to some of Tamara’s comments to clarify.

I wrote this article because I wanted to present the issues surrounding hormone replacement therapy to women in a way that was both accurate and accessible. I think one of the biggest challenges in science is clearly communicating scientific findings to the people who will benefit from these findings. Too often, scientists rely on scientific jargon to talk about results of studies. Although this may be more technically accurate, it can also alienate people who find this language intimidating. For the majority of discussions I think it is totally unnecessary to get into technical scientific details.

Specifically, in terms of whether the chemicals used in clinical trials are identical to the estrogen and progesterone our own bodies make, it is true that not all artificially created hormones are exactly alike. But, they are used because they act very similar to each other biologically. We don’t really know for sure if different estrogen or progesterone-like molecules are “safer” or more effective than others. As with anything in science, we can only make predictions based on the best evidence we have. So, for the sake of this discussion I am saying “estrogen” and “progesterone” to keep things simple.

In terms of the results of the WHI study nothing is misrepresented. I never said that estrogen alone increased breast cancer incidence in that study. Women are typically prescribed estrogen and progesterone since taking estrogen alone can cause uterine cancer. So, in terms of hormone replacement therapy, the estrogen + progesterone group is the most representative and is why this study is so often referred to.

Finally, what I wanted to convey with this article is that this is not a simple issue and there is no straightforward answer. This is in no way meant to be a definitive statement on what a woman should do. There is little question (based on the research we have today) that hormone replacement therapy, as with most things, comes with a risk. But I also tried to make it clear that there are significant benefits of taking HRT (protects bones, increases well-being) that are unmatched (based on the research we have today) by anything else. For some women these benefits will outweigh the risks, for others (women with mild symptoms for example) they may not. What I stated I would do personally is based on the fact that I, like Mhanh, am not experiencing menopausal symptoms yet. I may be singing a totally different tune when I am sweating through my sheets and feeling depressed. This decision is deeply personal and should be subject to change with each new piece of data. I would hope that any woman trying to make this decision would do their best to stay as informed as possible, knowing that there is no one “right” choice to make!

Ad Space Holder

Leave a comment

RECENT ARTICLES

Arts & Culture
Economy
Education
Politics
Science
Special Election Coverage
Technology
The WIP Editorial
The World