From the WIP

« The Lottery - Harlem Children’s Chance for a Successful Education | Main | Wearing a Headscarf in Turkey: An American Woman's Perspective »

January 25, 2011

The Best of 2010: An Interview with When We Leave Writer, Director, and Producer Feo Aladag

Jessica Mosby

by Jessica Mosby
-USA-

Rarely does a film come along that floors you in its perfection and then continues to resonate for months after that first viewing. I saw the German film When We Leave at the 2010 Tribeca Film Festival, where it won best film in the world narrative feature competition. When I entered the theater at Tribeca, I had no expectations about the movie. But two hours later I could not stop thinking and talking about what I had just watched. Writer, Director, and Producer Feo Aladag flawlessly couples the humanistic and thriller elements of filmmaking to create a cinematic force that makes you care about the characters while sitting on the edge of your seat fearful of what will happen next.

When We Leave begins with Umay (Sibel Kekilli) fleeing her abusive husband Kemal (Ufuk Bayraktar) by leaving Istanbul with their young son Cem (Nizam Schiller). Once she arrives at her family’s doorstep in Berlin she encounters a less than warm reception from her traditional Turkish parents (Derya Alabora and Settar Tanriöğen). The family is torn between their love for one another, and the pressure from the German Turkish community to send Umay – or at least Cem – back to Istanbul.

Even after her family’s rejection, Umay is unable to completely break familial ties. She is torn between a life free of traditional Islamic values and her family’s approval and acceptance. While Umay is struggling to start a new life for herself and Cem, her family is also reeling from the consequences of their decision to reject their own daughter. As her characters transform and evolve, Aladag’s direction creates an ominous tone that builds until the film’s unexpected finale.

When We Leave is Germany’s official entry for the Academy Award for best foreign language film. It opens in U.S. theaters on January 28.

When Aladag – best known as an actress – was in California to promote When We Leave during its screenings at the Mill Valley Film Festival, we spoke about her filmmaking process, her commitment to authenticity, and the movie’s international reception.

I know this is your debut film behind the camera. How did you conceive the idea to write, direct, and produce When We Leave?

It seemed like a natural decision when I knew I wanted to tell this story. It was just clear that I wanted to direct this - it wouldn’t be just writing [the screenplay]. Producing it came about because I wanted complete creative independence. To me - acting, writing, and directing - they are just different forms of expression deriving from the need to communicate.

When writing the script how did you balance the more personal narrative with the thriller tone?

I tried to create a core that would be emotionally true in a universal sense, keep it interesting, and keep it flowing for an audience. In a way [the story is] like a Greek tragedy, working in a very classical way of structuring the story. You just try to create true moments in the script. Coming from acting helped me a great deal in the sense that you have a very clear feeling about the rhythm of a scene and the dialogue, and just creating characters and moments that feel true.

Did you write the script with particular actors in mind?

No. Absolutely no. I had a very long casting process. I was pretty sure that I wanted to work with – for the parts of the parents – actors from Turkey. It seemed important for me, if I’m portraying a family, to bring in this background. It seemed important to me to be authentic language-wise, and not teach someone Turkish. I think, especially for people who watch it coming from this language background, that it is important - that it feels true to them.

I did a very long process of street casting for the brother and sister, the child, and also for the part of Umay, actually. It’s been quite a mixture of conventional casting processes – national, but also in Turkey, in Switzerland, in France, in Austria – combined with an extensive street casting process that went over one and a half years.


By “street casting” do you mean that you were approaching people on the street who did not necessarily have an acting background?

That’s correct. I wanted to work, especially with the young people, with people we had not seen before. I was interested in finding new faces, and in finding people with no acting experience and bringing them together with people who would bring a lot of acting experience to the table. I had a very heterogeneous ensemble in mind, and that worked out really well.

We really invested a lot of time and effort in casting on the street. We had tons of people working on this – I had more than 2,000 people being interviewed. And actually I just asked them small questions and looked them in the eye, and then I narrowed that down. Gradually we went to a more conventional casting process. I had quite a big group of young people I did a [acting] workshop with over a period of time – meeting a couple of times a week and working with them based on my [acting] technique. And [then] we narrowed that group down again. With those [people] I eventually had in a very small group, I worked for four months in order to let them be a family. Even if you don’t have scenes on screen together, I thought it was very important if I’m portraying a family that it’s people here who really know each other.

It was very interesting for me to work on this very strictly orchestrated script. I wanted to stick to [the script] in a very exact way, but still give actors – especially people with no acting background – the tools to be true in the moment and to really react in the moment based on the words in the script. It was a very rewarding process in itself.

After you cast the principal characters you then worked with them for four months before you started filming?

Well I worked with those people who had never acted before for four months. I was trying to provide them with some tools. If you work with people who have no acting background whatsoever, I think it’s important for them to feel protected and to feel safe in the environment of filming. There is so much pressure when you have sixty people watching you and you’ve never acted before. I tried to teach them whatever I could, and I tried to bring people in who could [also] teach them.


Then how long did the actual filming take?

We filmed 38 days altogether. We shot in two countries; we shot in Berlin, and we shot in Istanbul.

How has the film been received? Are you concerned that the film will be perceived as being anti-Islamic?

No, and it hasn’t so far. I think what was my problem with the media coverage on those issues was that there was a lot of black and white painting going on. People were not being portrayed in a humanistic way. Approaching all of the characters with empathy helped that minorities didn’t feel that they had been portrayed in a way they wouldn’t like to be portrayed. You do see how much the father is suffering and you do see how much the older brother is suffering. They are torn. I think it helped that people didn’t feel they had been portrayed in a wrong way.

I even experienced that in Pakistan when I brought the film there two and half weeks ago. People could really relate to [the film] because they can associate with all of the characters told in the story. That’s what helped. I’m not getting tired of pointing out in every single possible interview that honor killings are not something you can chain down to Islam or to Turkey or to a certain country. But it is a global problem.

What has the reaction to the film been in your home country of Germany and as you’ve taken the film abroad?

I feel really blessed and privileged. We have shown the film in 28 countries since its release in the spring in Germany. That’s been such an experience to travel to all those countries and talk to people and listen to people and see and feel their reactions. You can’t do it with every film you make, but I feel really blessed that it happened with this one.

In Germany it’s been very emotional, and people open up a great a deal. They are very tense Q&As in the sense that people share their emotions, which is something I have great admiration for if you are part of an audience and take a microphone and stand up to talk about very intimate things. I really hope that we add a little part to an ongoing dialogue and keep it going.


For the trailer in English, click here.

About the Author:
Jessica Mosby
is a writer and critic living in Oakland, California. In the rare moments when she's not traveling across the United States for work, Jessica enjoys listening to public radio, buying organic food at local farmers markets, trolling junk stores, and collecting owl-themed tchotchke.

Comments (4)

Despite a dearth of women directors I commend Jessica Mosby for finding so many women like Feo Aladag to interview for The WIP. Although The WIP posts interviews with both male and female directors Jessica has brought so many excellent female directors to The WIP's attention. I have already seen When We Leave and like Jessica it left me pondering the tragedy of the story not only for hours but for several days. Aldag's note in this interview that the story structure is similar to a greek tragedy is exactly what it felt like. I am surprised that the film did not get the Oscar nomination it deserved!

What places this film out of its ethnic and cultural context is the tragic structure of its plot. One thinks of Sophocles's Antigone while watching this film. Like King Creon, the father in When We Leave makes the ironic and tragic choice to comply with the male centric code of his community and banishes his daughter. He marshals his sons to support that choice and the dynamic of the tragedy unfolds from there. I do not want to give away the surprise ending but I will say it truly is a remarkable tragedy.

Thank you, Jessica. I am very excited to see this movie. I am really interested to see how the director and actors are able to demonstrate the conflict between loyalty to community and culture versus loyalty to self. I did not come from a strong cultural background, so I am fascinated how other people's lives are shaped and heavily influenced by their community and culture. I appreciate the empathetic aspect of the movie, especially when, in our current media, it is easy to present such complex issues in a way that is biased and lacks the appropriate context for understanding.

Really well written article about an extraordinary film...I saw it about a month ago and I still think of the characters in the story. I highly recommend this film...

Ad Space Holder

Leave a comment

RECENT ARTICLES

Arts & Culture
Economy
Education
Politics
Science
Special Election Coverage
Technology
The WIP Editorial
The World