California’s recent budget stalemate is nothing new to our state. In fact, it’s been happening for years and is the result of an ineffective state requirement of more than a simple majority to pass budgets. California’s two-thirds majority rule produces a drawn out circus of negotiations that lawmakers have forced us to endure nearly every year for the past 32 years. Education suffers annually from the instability and uncertainty of this process and is usually on the chopping block when Democrats make concessions to Republicans in order to win their votes - this year $11.6 billion was cut. Without a better system to pass a budget, how can we hope to address the education problems facing our state?
This year California’s stalemate was record breaking. On Friday, February 19th, lawmakers finally agreed on a combination of tax increases, spending cuts, and borrowing to eliminate California’s $41 billion dollar budget gap - after nearly a week of political horse trading in Sacramento. In the Senate, the two-thirds majority was finally reached after Democrats made adequate concessions to Senate Republican, Abel Maldonado. Maldonado joined two Republican colleagues and the Democrats to hit the needed threshold. In the end, California got a budget that resolves the shortfall but at the expense of crippling cuts pushed by the minority in order to break the stalemate. According to State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Jack O’Connell, the recent budget “essentially transfers our state cash flow problem to local schools and districts.”
Proponents of the two-thirds majority claim it is a necessary safeguard so the minority party is not irrelevant to the budget process. But what does that say about our Democracy? What about the will of the people and the candidates we vote for to represent us at the state level?
Our current system essentially tells California voters that although you elect your representatives, the minority party actually knows better than the voter what is right for California. It is a system that dilutes the power of our elected officials who are in the majority. As it currently stands, Democrats have majorities in both the state Assembly and Senate. They are prohibited, however, from passing a budget without at least a few Republican votes in both houses. Since Democrats and Republicans have very different ideas about what’s best for California, shouldn’t it be that if Republicans want a louder voice, they must win more support from Californians for their way of doing business?
The final budget wasn’t particularly palatable to either Democrats or Republicans. According to Karen Bass, Democratic Speaker of the California State Assembly, who spoke with Rachel Maddow on the eve of the final passage, “California is ready to go over a cliff and that will happen tomorrow because tomorrow, 276 more projects, which will lead to tens of thousands of people being put out of work, will be called to a halt tomorrow if we don’t get that one Republican vote tonight.”
Because of the severity of the situation, our Republican governor and legislative leaders from both parties had spent months negotiating a budget together that would fix the deficit problem and not bring state projects to a costly halt. But even teamwork could not prevent what the two-thirds majority guarantees – an obstructionist minority party has the power to bring the budget process and the state to its knees.
Although I disagree with Senator Maldonado’s need for concessions from the Democrats before doing what is right for California, it certainly took a lot of courage to join the Democrats. Maldonado, like all the Republicans in our state legislature, signed a pledge never to raise taxes. Republicans who break with the party in order to do what is right have literally been threatened by right-wing talk radio shows across the state. In her interview with Maddow, Bass described one station that posted caricatures of Republican legislators’ heads on sticks on its website, and has threatened to have them recalled.
The two-thirds majority debacle is not limited to legislators passing budgets. In 1978, Proposition 13 expanded the two-thirds vote requirement to raising any tax in the state. Last November here in Monterey County, ballot Measure Z won 62.55% of the vote to improve our roads and provide alternatives to driving. Though Measure Z was supported by all five county supervisors, Republicans and Democrats, and all 12 City Councils in the county, it still came up short of the two-thirds majority needed to pass.
Over the years many California communities have faced the same uphill battles to pass school bonds and other initiatives. When a two-thirds majority is needed, the will of the few often supersedes the good of the majority. And, when ideology obstructs logic and inhibits the state’s ability to take care of its people, we clearly have a system that is broken.
It will take a vote before the people to change the two-thirds majority rule in California. Hopefully, after this year’s budget stalemate and subsequent fallout for the state’s most vulnerable citizens, California voters will be ready to take on this campaign and vote to repeal this flawed system.
My blog is part of a month-long series on education in California,
published in partnership with the University of Phoenix and our publishing platform
Six Apart. WIP Contributor Kimberly Chase is also participating.
Be sure to look for both of our articles, as features and Talk blogs each Monday in March.
As a mom with a small baby, these videos and this story is no longer news. Instead they are an intolerable circumstance I feel compelled to change. We all must do our part to transform the political structures that value dominance and power. A woman who is capable and can be a part of a thriving community, culture, and economy is raising a child in a burned out car on the street. Another, a child herself, is living with HIV and raising her baby brother. Society can be so blind.
Posted by Kate Daniels | March 2, 2010 4:17 PM
Thank you for your insightful and personal series on Afghanistan. How violence begets violence is clearly exemplified in the US engagement in Iraq and in Afghanistan. Despite the many convincing arguments the Obama administration has provided for continued force, the Afghan people and the American public both deserve the true nation building commitment you prescribe.
President Obama has an opportunity to put an end to many of the dark practices that cloud our democracy - from the culture of war profiteering that you comment on to our broken electoral system where the candidate with the most money always wins.
Your articles and your film are one pathway up to the Kabul that you dream of seeing once more. I too look forward to the time when both a modern Afghanistan as well as an uncorrupted United States are true partners in a thriving world community.
Posted by Kate Daniels | March 1, 2010 3:51 PM
Gianna- Thank you so much for your humorous commentary on the state of affairs in California's classroom and the reckless abandonment of real education. Please continue to share your stories here. Kate
Posted by Kate Daniels | January 27, 2010 6:08 PM
Thank you, Shailja, for your insights and for this comprehensive guide to support the people of Haiti. I will share it as a resource.
Posted by Kate Daniels | January 15, 2010 4:18 PM
What a sweet vignette to remind me what I have to be grateful for and a gentle nudge to remember to give back what has been so graciously been given to me. Thank you, Cesar.
Posted by Kate Daniels | December 22, 2009 10:43 AM
As the gender balance increases in France's boardrooms, I look forward following the impact it has on the companies bottom lines. I wish quotas weren't the way they had to go but unfortunately meritocracy has proven to be a myth for women. Just look at the numbers the article cites - a pathetic 15% of Fortune 500 hundred company boards are women in the US all the while women are graduating college in higher numbers are surpassing men in the workforce. Certainly, it is not a lack of hard work and perseverance that has kept women out of the boardroom...
Posted by Kate Daniels | December 5, 2009 7:51 AM
Mousavi's pledges are certainly exciting - privacy rights, revision of discriminatory laws against women, removing the morality police and allowing a free press. I am also very encouraged by the grassroots forces behind his election as well as the prominent role of his wife, Zahra Rahnavard, on the campaign trail.
Great article.
Posted by Kate Daniels | June 11, 2009 10:02 AM
It is really good to hear from you, Constance. It is so valuable to hear the reality of the crisis in Zimbabwe from someone we've come to know so well at The WIP these past two years. The Indian community and their water hole is truly a blessing. I can't imagine life without water, something so many take for granted as it flows freely and clean from the kitchen sink.
How will Zimbabwe stabilize? What can the MDC, the SADC, or the AU do differently? Is there any hope for change as long as Mugabe still has power? What can someone here in the USA do to support the people of Zimbabwe and help?
Posted by Kate Daniels | May 18, 2009 7:40 AM
Recently, my husband and I saw the movie Earth, a Disney Nature film that follows one year in the life of three families - polar bears, elephants, and whales. Despite the "family friendly" label, I cried all the way through. I am overwhelmed by the feeling that we are not fighting the climate crisis fast enough. I turned to my husband after the film hoping for some reassurance and answers - he is a creative, bright, engineer whose work often connects him to the very industries that I feel make the daily actions I take reducing and recycling practically irrelevant. His insights into both the rate of global warming and political obstacles to ending our reliance on coal power made me feel even worse.
Nancy's article is incredibly inspiring. I look forward to reading Go Green, Save Green and learning even more about how to change in my own life. Saving money in the meantime will also be great!
Posted by Kate Daniels | May 15, 2009 2:04 PM
I am so touched that on this Earth Day we got to hear from 18-year-old Emma Sleeth! It has been two years since we had the inspiring opportunity to interview her father, Dr Matthew Sleeth. I consider all my beliefs and concerns about the environment strictly scientific, yet this amazing Christian family has inspired unity among faith based communities and science-minded folks like me to address what I believe is the most critical issue of our time and one that must be addressed cooperatively. This is something that neither politicians nor religious figures have been able to do — unify all of us in a common dialog that supersedes other political or religious concerns. Follow their lead - it is contagious!
Posted by Kate Daniels | April 22, 2009 5:28 AM