The Challenges of Urbanization
The chaotic growth of today's cities can no longer be ignored. The great challenge is how to improve the quality of urban life by ensuring harmonious growth. Cities can--and should--learn from the experiences of other cities with similar characteristics. This effort requires not only the participation of urban planners but public health and environmental experts, politicians, and fundamentally, the communities themselves. Only when these actions are carried out will it be possible, perhaps, to reach that almost ideal situation heralded by Hippocrates some 2,600 years ago: a balance between the human organism and its environment.
When observing the chaotic, burgeoning growth of the modern city, the more erudite of urban planners will reminisce wistfully on how different it is from its ancient Greek counterpart, the polis, which Italian architectural historian Leonardo Benevolo once described as "dynamic but stable, in balance with nature, and growing manageably even after reaching large dimensions."
The rapid and uncontrolled sprawl of today's cities breeds anxiety not only among urban planners and architects. Experts in the field of public health are alarmed as well, for the apparent randomness of the urban dynamic is robbing the population of its basic health and well-being through unregulated environmental pollution, shrinking green areas, inadequate housing, overburdened public services, a mushrooming of makeshift settlements on the outskirts lacking in both infrastructure and services, mounting anomie and the sheer numbers of neighbors who do not know neighbors.
Beijing, a city of over 17 million inhabitants, exemplifies this social alienation. Until the early 1980s, the Chinese capital was constructed as a multitude of siheyuans, or one-story complexes built around a common courtyard that were inhabited by three or four families who shared a single kitchen and water spigot. These courtyards were connected by narrow streets called hutongs that formed a grid from north to south and east to west.
This open structure greatly facilitated contact between neighbors, encouraged the sharing of resources, fostered relations between contiguous families, and enabled the elderly to care for children and share with them their passion for songbirds. Because of these characteristics, these almost idyllic structures were described as "collections of small rural villages."
Until the mid-1980s, only a few skyscrapers disrupted the harmony of the landscape. Today that panorama has the look and feel of the ultimate modern city, where, with few exceptions, these "small rural villages" have been supplanted by sterile, towering skyscrapers. This striking change is not limited to external structure; it has also dramatically altered the fabric of human relations.
Physical isolation has led to an increase in crime, destroyed the local sense of solidarity, and contributed to the fragmentation of what were once cohesive family groups. As the distance between home and the workplace has also increased considerably, workers now find themselves devoting what was once valuable family time to exhausting commutes in overcrowded buses or subways.
According to Chen Xitong, a former mayor of Beijing, "the capital is growing increasingly ugly and it is steadily losing its Chinese character. Most of the modern high-rise buildings, with their boring concrete facades, look like dominoes set down in the landscape without plan and without imagination."
This situation, of course, is not limited to China. In many Latin American cities, old colonial mansions of considerable historic and architectural value are being replaced by huge apartment buildings unrelated to the character of the neighborhood. A new kind of war is being waged in cities throughout the world: Esthetics vs Profits.
- In this blog series, Dr. Cesar Chelala explores the many challenges presented by urbanization, the impact of urban migration, challenges to health, and challenges of providing clean water. - Ed.
Cesar Chelala, MD, PhD, is an international public health consultant and a writer on human rights issues and foreign affairs.

Comments (3)
Dr. Chelala, your remarks are timely and the issues are matters of great concern,, touching on so many areas of human well being and on the future of the planet.
I am wondering if the World Social Forum would not be a place to bring these up, if indeed you have not already done that. I understand that this year there will not be the ususal one meeting, but a number of them all around the world. The US Social Forum takes place this summer in Detroit.
As I understand it, one can participate in the planning and now would be a good time to do that, getting this on the calendar and attracking people to meet. The link in the paragraph before this one takes you to the US Social Forum website which is calling now for people to organize events.
I look forward to further posts on this site and thank you for bringing this to our attention.
Posted by Nancy Vining Van Ness | January 25, 2010 7:42 PM
Its unfortunate that urbanization has lead to a compromise of sorts instead of being one with human relationships as cities were in the past. Your article has brought to the fore this issue that has been a cause of worry for every nation, now every human.
I hate to think that at this rate humans might become so individualistic that the jungle rule will return. If not...its in a way already happening.
Posted by lesley | January 28, 2010 3:21 AM
Dr. Chelal,
Thanks for the great article showing the cause of the negatives in cities. Living in close proximity to two cities namely Washington DC and Baltimore City, I cannot agree more as it is the same in cities everywhere. When I'm scheduled to go into a city, I am apprehensive because you never now what can occur.
From the often angry, drug addicted or jaded people walking around to the aggressive drivers who believe they own the roads, I find being in these cities unnerving. Recently, in both cities parking rates have been ridiculously increased and speed cameras installed to pay for the cities deficits. These cities often leave people who visit with a negative lasting memory.
The schools often have bad graduating statistics and high drop out rates. In Baltimore, there are even billboards that advertise the positives of marriage. This is to counter the statistics showing high rates of single parenting there. The lethal cocktail of low education levels and single parenting produces nothing positive.
As for a solution, I don't know what the solution is. At one time I used to believe relocation of people was the solution, but I was proved wrong. In DC years ago, they gave people incentives to move out and go to places like Laurel, MD, which was a nice suburb that is relatively close. In no time, Laurel took on many of the negative characteristics of where the people came from. Subsequently, many of the people and good stores in the mall, who were there before promptly moved out leaving Laurel to deteriorate. So I don't believe relocation is the solution anymore.
I really wish anyone or organization who can tackle city problems a lot of luck because they will certainly need it.
Posted by Miss Majek | February 9, 2010 12:08 PM